> I do not see any higher throughput (20%) with the 5.1p1 (with UMAC-64)
> than 4.5p1. The above results clearly says it is not increasing the
> performance by 20%. Did I something here?.
I'd say the 16% and 18% figures give reasonable credibility to the
"approximately 20% faster" claim.
> With OpenSSH-5.1p1:-
> ------------------------
> Protocol Time taken rate MB/s
> Std. scp 53.7 19.3
> scp -c arcfour 40.1 26.3
> scp -c blowfish 55.5 18.6
> scp -C 123.6 16.3
>
>
> With OpenSSH-4.5p1:-
> -------------------------
> Protocol Time taken rate MB/s
> Std. scp 59.9 17.9
> scp -c arcfour 45 22.3
> scp -c blowfish 59.6 17.1
> scp -C 131 14.1
Let's reformat your data just a bit:
Protocol 4.5p1 MB/s 5.1p1 MB/s increase
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Std. scp 17.9 19.3 8%
arcfour 22.3 26.3 18%
blowfish 17.1 18.6 9%
scp -C 14.1 16.3 16%
> I do not see any higher throughput (20%) with the 5.1p1 (with UMAC-64)
> than 4.5p1. The above results clearly says it is not increasing the
> performance by 20%. Did I something here?.
I'd say the 16% and 18% figures give reasonable credibility to the
"approximately 20% faster" claim.
[ reply ]